Dear Wien2k developers and users, I would be grateful for your opinion, clarification or pointers to literature about core states in Wien2k or LAPW in general. My message is a bit long, I am sorry for that.

It seems to me that there is some inconsistency in the way Wien2k treats the core states in spin-polarized calculations. As far as I understand it, LCORE is run twice, once for spin-up potential and once for spin-down potential. In each of these runs, the core states are full (up and dn occupied). Then, I suppose, the up charge density is set to 1/2 of the LCORE charge run for the up potential and dn charge density is set to 1/2 of the LCORE charge run for the dn potential. That is different than running a core solver once, each spin channel feeling its own potential, which would seem to me as a more "rigorous" strategy (but one could not use the same quantum numbers for the core states as LCORE does). I suppose that different approaches to the core states have some effect also on the total-energy expression, since it contains sum of eigenvalues (I suppose since mixer reads them from case.scf). In Wien2k, there are two eigenvalues for each core state for spin-polarized calculations. I checked Elk, and if I understand its output correctly, it lists only one eigenvalue for each core state for spin-polarized calculations. That probably means, that Elk runs one core calculation for an averaged potential (though I did not investigate Elk in detail to know for sure). Do you know about any book or paper where different strategies would be discussed and/or tested/compared? My LAPW reference, the David Singh's book, does not appear to touch this. It may well be that for full core states all this is usually negligible, but I am more concerned about consequences for the open-core approximation for 4f states (which is where I actually noticed this "issue") http://www.wien2k.at/reg_user/faq/open_core.html The FAQ entry does not mention spin-polarized calculations, but runsp does look for case.inc[up,dn] and it will use them if they exist. Then, fully spin-polarized polarized f^7 state is calculated as 1/2 (I suppose) of f^14 state, for instance. That is likely a good approximation for Eu^2+ charge density (full shell vs full subshell), but the eigenvalues/total energy are less obvious. And accuracy of approximating fully spin-polarized f^6 with 1/2 of spin-restricted f^12 is even less obvious even for the charge density. I see that the FAQ entry says that one should use LDA+U instead of open core, but it has its own set of problems when applied to localized 4f too. And open core has one attractive feature for me - it gives an easy way to do calculations with constrained number of 4f electrons. Do you think it is meaningful to compare total energies for such calculations with different number of 4f electrons (charge-neutral cells, electrons shuffled between 4f and valence s,p,d). Any comments welcome. Best regards, Jindrich _______________________________________________ Wien mailing list Wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at http://zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/mailman/listinfo/wien SEARCH the MAILING-LIST at: http://www.mail-archive.com/wien@zeus.theochem.tuwien.ac.at/index.html