Done, link: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiXRay#Share_of_bots_edits
As you can see, enwiki and jawiki have much lower rates of bot edits than other language editions. Perhaps it deserves some attention, and for sure, I will metion it in my thesis :). Thanks to Erik and Ziko for pointing this out. Best, F. --- El sáb, 15/11/08, Felipe Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > De: Felipe Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Asunto: [Wiki-research-l] Share of monthly bot edits > Para: "'Research into Wikimedia content and communities'" > <[email protected]>, "Erik Zachte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fecha: sábado, 15 noviembre, 2008 8:49 > Hi all. > > Maybe tomorrow, if I'm not too busy, I will have a > detailed graph of what's going on, at least in the > top-10 (or top-20) editions. > > In the meantime, some basic spells on MySQL show this for > eswiki: > http://pastebin.com/m19859c24 > > Where perc_logged_revs shows % of bots edits over total > number of logged users edits (by month) and perc_revs shows > % of bots edits over total number of revs (by month, > including annonymous users). > > The magic of numbers is that they are (most of times) > completely objective. Erik, your numbers seems to be fine, > also looking at the monthly trends. Maybe my impression (and > other past graphs) are only valid for enwiki, but I begin to > have my doubts looking at these results. Tomorrow, we will > see. > > All the same, we all agree in that bots should be filtered > out, but it was a curious question for me. > > Best, > > F. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
