At the risk of self-promotion, you might find the following useful. We looked at the "coverage" part, and not the "accuracy" part:
Halavais, A. and Lackaff, D. (2008) An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2). 429-440. On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Adrianne Wadewitz <[email protected]> wrote: > I am looking at submitting a grant so that I can work on an analyses > of en.wikipedia's coverage of art, literature, and history articles - > their accuracy, etc. I am looking to establish a complete bibliography > of all of the "quality" assessments that have been done about > Wikipedia - on any language. Could we pool our knowledge? > > Thanks! > > Adrianne > > -- > Adrianne Wadewitz > Teaching Fellow > English department > Indiana University > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > -- -- // // This email is // [x] assumed public and may be blogged / forwarded. // [ ] assumed to be private, please ask before redistributing. // // Alexander C. Halavais, ciberflâneur // http://alex.halavais.net // _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
