Steven Walling wrote: > This is fantastic! I'm going to be trying it out more, but here are two > pieces of immediate feedback:
Thank you! > 1. It would be great to have the list of references indicate in some way > how many times a particular reference is used. The highlighting is > great, but you would still have to scroll through an article and count > the number of times it is used to get an overview. This information is actually there, but only in the expanded view. You have to click the reference on the GUI to see this. We may consider putting it in the basic view. > 2. Distinguishing between footnotes (see: Wikipedia:Citing > Sources#Foonotes) and references felt a tad rough. It clearly marked out > the bare ref tags (i.e. the <> icon), but in large and high quality > articles, especially Featured Articles, the separation between footnoted > citations and references becomes quite important. Demo the sheep article > for an example of what I'm talking about. This is a valid point. Currently, it does not attempt to detect (based on e.g. section on page) whether a <ref> tag is actually a reference. > Kudos on a useful project, Thanks again, Matthew Flaschen _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
