Chitu Okoli wrote: > We have now updated the following page with the peer-reviewed journal > articles and doctoral theses we have identified: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_studies_of_Wikipedia. Please > note that we have only updated the sections on peer-reviewed journal articles > and on theses; we have not updated other sections with newly identified > studies, except for correcting some misclassified items.
I am glad somebody found time and will to update this page again. I stopped doing so two or three years back, sadly. > To help us in identifying all eligible studies, we would really appreciate it > if you could look at the sections on peer-reviewed journal articles and > theses in > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_studies_of_Wikipedia, and > send us any citations (by yourself or others) that you know are missing. In > particular, please inform us of: I see you found three out of my four papers, I will add the missing one :> A while ago I started a draft of a paper in which I attempted to review the Wikipedia research up to 2007. I never finished it, but perhaps you'd find it of use. Let me know if you'd like a copy. -- Piotr Konieczny "To be defeated and not submit, is victory; to be victorious and rest on one's laurels, is defeat." --Józef Pilsudski _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
