The top link is a typo, though it's corrected later:
http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Chitu Okoli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As I mentioned in an e-mail last week, we are on the final stages of a large
> literature review on scholarly research on Wikipedia. We have extracted and
> organized most of the data and have published it to a Semantic MediaWiki
> wiki at http://wikilit.refarata.com.
http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page

[Thanks to emijpr for inspiring the
> structure through WikiPapers.] As I indicated, this is sort of an incubator
> site to finish up our data to prepare for publication, after which we intend
> to export the data permanently to other sites like AcaWiki and WikiPapers.
>
> Thanks for your responses to my inquiries; we have included abstracts, and
> the data is dual-licensed as CC-BY-SA and ODC-ODbl
> (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/) [thanks, Dario, for the
> links!], except for copyrighted abstracts. We have submitted a related
> presentation proposal for Wikimania 2012 at
> http://wikimania2012.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/Wikilit:_Ten_years_of_Wikipedia_research.
>
> We are asking the Wikipedia research community to please help us verify the
> accuracy of our data extraction so far. Practically, if you could at least
> take a look at your own publications and the publications you know well,
> that would be great. It's an open wiki, so please make any corrections
> directly, even anonymously. (However, if you want us to acknowledge your
> contributions, please create a user account and identify yourself on your
> user page.) In particular, please help us with the following:
> * Please correct any inaccuracies you see, or e-mail us at [email protected]
> to notify us of them.
> * Please point out any peer-reviewed journal articles or PhD dissertations
> we have missed that were published before July 2011; we will certainly add
> these. (After that, the Wikimedia Research Newsletter began.)
> * Please point out any other scholarly studies (especially conference
> articles and significant non-peer-reviewed work) that you feel should
> definitely be analyzed in detail. Although we have listed 1,500 conference
> papers (http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/List_of_conference_papers), our
> limited time and resources only permits us to analyze a fraction of them in
> detail. So, please help us highlight the most important ones that we have
> not analyzed in detail, with a brief explanation of why they are
> particularly important.
> * Please add any published scholarly studies about Wikipedia that we have
> left out, regardless of peer review or publication type! Please add your own
> work! Our restrictions in what we include are purely pragmatic due to time
> and resource limitations. However, if you add a new article, please be sure
> to *complete as many input fields as possible*, since we will generally
> exclude any article with incomplete data in our final analysis.
> * Please suggest any data analysis or visualizations you would like to see
> as we synthesize the data.
> * Please give any other feedback or suggestion that can help us make this
> dataset more useful to researchers! Send comments to [email protected].
>
> The data is publicly available, but this is a beta release and there are
> probably a lot of errors. We hope to have a stable and very clean dataset
> within a couple months, both from community help and from our own internal
> quality control processes; we'll make another announcement when we feel the
> dataset has reached "featured" quality. In particular, please wait a bit
> before exporting the data to other research collection websites and wikis
> until it is in a cleaner state; by then, we'll help make it available in as
> many export formats as practical.
>
> Regards,
> Chitu
> For the WikiLit project team: Arto Lanamäki, Mohamad Mehdi, Mostafa Mesgari,
> Finn Årup Nielsen, Chitu Okoli
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to