@Audrey, are you sure you want to study motivations to contribute to Wikipedia? Maybe you should study flamewars on Wikipedia mailing lists instead, it promises to be a subject on which you could get lots of observational data!
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:11 PM, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]> wrote: > >> James, I think I have replied consistently to your requests, both on wiki >> and by mail.... > > Anyone can judge for themselves whether this is true by looking at > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research_talk:FAQ > > There you claimed that research approval was a mandatory policy, and > much more recently you thanked a third party for an edit which clearly > implies that it is strictly mandatory. But in September 2010 you > agreed with the rest of the RCom that research subject recruitment > approval should not be mandatory in favor of published guidelines > instead. And when called on the inconsistency, you wrote that approval > is not in fact mandatory. Both can not be true. > > Instead of apologizing for your lie with which you attempted to impugn > my integrity, you have been trying to cover it up with rhetoric. > > Is that behavior considered acceptable at the Wikimedia Foundation? > > Sincerely, > James Salsman > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
