On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ward Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On May 3, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Steven Walling wrote:
>
> I would strongly encourage you to join the movement lobbying for openness in
> scholarly work. Otherwise, you're complaining about a problem that
> Wikipedians do not have the power to fix, because academics tacitly support
> a system in which knowledge is kept in the hands of the few who can pay for
> it.
>
>
> Wow. I never made this connection. I'd always thought of the issue as the
> somewhat idealistic:
>
> scholar => citizen
>
> But you are absolutely right, the more immediate need is:
>
> scholar => wikipedian => citizen
>
> Of course citizens and wikipedians are sometimes hard to distinguish. But,
> with the distinction made, the path is more believably important.
>

Ward, as ever you have a talent for breaking complex ideas down into
clear statements :) I think this is right, yes, is a position that we
can get better at articulating as a community.

This is self-serving, but I just gave a short talk about this topic last week:
http://www.phoebeayers.info/phlog/?p=2377

cheers,
Phoebe

_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to