Yup. I'm thinking the same things. Now, if all of these were the norm, how would work be different?
On Sep 14, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Samuel Klein wrote: > I don't know... how about: > > You have a good project idea someone should do. You publish it. > You know some people doing interesting work in the area who need x,y,z to > tackle such a project, and add that. > You start a project. You publish a pointer and project name. > Some collaborators join. You publish names. > You get a target to take data from, have a meeting, and publish. > You finalize procedures and start implementing. and publish. > You get first data. and publish. > You get context for the data. And publish. > You find time to look at the data, organize the context, add a summary, and > publish. > You compile a full schedule of data, and run analysis, publishing your error > logs and lab notebook pages on the fly. > You give a paper bag talk with slides (and publish) > You draft an abstract for peer review (and publish) > You finish an abstract and submit it for review (a. p.) > You get feedback from the journal you submitted to (a. p.) and revise (a. p.) > You get included in a major quarterly Journal, with polish (a. p.) > You get public commentary, cites, criticism; and make better talk slides (a. > p.) > You add suggestions for your students or others to extend the work in future > papers (a. p.) > > Various fields adopt various subsets of the above; most have only a handful > towards the end. > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Ward Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 14, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Samuel Klein wrote: > >> People should be able to publish their work as quickly as they like in a >> professional way, especially in fields that change rapidly and need to >> benefit from collaborating with one another. > > Hmm. What is the quickest way that we would ever want to publish our work? If > we push on this hard enough we might change the nature of work. (Yes, I know, > much in academia conspires against quick. Same for business and probably > dating. But as a thought experiment, how quick could quick be?) > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > > > -- > Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266 > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
