no, that's based on textual feedback data from a small random sample of articles [1] from the AFTv5 tests, not the current ratings (AFTv4)
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:AFT On Oct 27, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Taha Yasseri <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Dario. > I should also add your own CSCW'13 paper. Right? > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Dario Taraborelli > <[email protected]> wrote: > …and on a final note, this is an awesome work in progress that attempts to > classify Wikipedia articles based on a broad range of quality metrics > (including AFT ratings). > > https://github.com/slaporte/qualityvis > > > On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I forgot to mention Ashton Anderson's dataviz work based on AFTv4 data >> >> https://graphics.stanford.edu/wikis/cs448b-11-fall/FP-AndersonAshton >> >> On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Taha, >>> >>> other than the internal reports during the product dev phase [1] and some >>> occasional uses of this data in the literature, there hasn't been much work >>> on AFT ratings. To my knowledge, the best use of this data outside of WMF >>> is in Adam Hyland's work (he presented a study at Wikimania [2] and I think >>> he's working on a follow-up paper). >>> >>> Dario >>> >>> [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Research >>> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Protonk/Article_Feedback >>> >>> >>> On Oct 27, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Taha Yasseri <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dario, >>>> Thank you. That's indeed a very interesting data set. >>>> >>>> Is anyone aware of any study or analysis of this or similar data on >>>> "article ratings"? >>>> Even a raw data analysis would be very helpful to set up a systematic >>>> study. Unfortunately, I'm not update on the state of the art. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> .Taha >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Dario Taraborelli >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We've released a full, anonymized dump of article ratings (aka AFTv4) >>>> collected over 1 year since the deployment of the tool on the entire >>>> English Wikipedia (July 22, 2011 - July 22, 2012). >>>> >>>> http://thedatahub.org/en/dataset/wikipedia-article-ratings >>>> >>>> The dataset (which includes 11m unique article ratings along 4 dimensions) >>>> is licensed under CC0 and supersedes the partial dumps originally hosted >>>> on the dumps server. Real-time AFTv4 data remains available as usual via >>>> the toolserver. Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions about >>>> this data. >>>> >>>> Dario >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> .t >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wiki-research-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >>> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > > > -- > .t > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
