> Is wiki research (including Wikipedia research) research on computer-supported collaborative work (CSCW).
Sure. A lot of it. If it's research of the nature of wikis, then certainly. A lot of papers that study Wikipedia/wikis are published via ACM CSCW[1]. If it's research that just so happens to use Wikipedia as a dataset, then I don't know if we should even call it Wikipedia research. Some research of the content and work patterns in Wikipedia is a mixture of the two. For example, an analysis of the content in Wikipedia might be useful for identifying bias and missing information -- even if that was not original intention of the study and identifying bias and missing information is purely used to tune some content algorithm. 1. http://cscw.acm.org On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Finn Årup Nielsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can I ask a silly question: Is wiki research (including Wikipedia > research) research on computer-supported collaborative work (CSCW). > > My immediate thought was: yes of course. I do note that on Wikipedia there > is only a parenthetic mentioning of Wikipedia in "Computer-supported > cooperative work" and no mentioning of CSCW in "Wiki" (but I have also > heard that you shouldn't trust Wikipedia because anyone can edit). > > I suppose that some wiki research could be non-CSCW research? E.g., > research on named entity extraction using Wikipedia would not be called > CSCW. > > > best regards > Finn Årup Nielsen > http://www.compute.dtu.dk/~faan/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
