Sweet! Can I ask that we make the 2% explicitly available to wiki gnomes? :)
On Monday, 9 February 2015, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfa...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Hey folks, > > Dario and I just updated the scholarly citations dataset to include > Digital Object Identifiers. We found 742k citations (524k unique DOIs) in > 172k articles. Our spot checking suggests that 98% of these DOIs resolve. > The remaining 2% were extracted correctly, but they appear to be typos. > > http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1299540 > > Like the dataset that we released for PubMed Identifiers, this dataset > includes > the first known occurrence of a DOI citation in an English Wikipedia > article and the associated revision metadata, based on the most recent > complete content dump of English Wikipedia. > > Feel free to share this with anyone interested via: > https://twitter.com/WikiResearch/status/564908585008627712 > > We'll be organizing our own work and analysis of these citations here: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Scholarly_article_citations_in_Wikipedia > > -Aaron > -- Sent from my mobile computing device of Lovecraftian complexity and horror.
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
