Well, if you got all your learning out of the way in the first email, I'm really confused as to what you thought a backhanded "none of you are helping" would do 3 hours later. You asked an honest question, you got a very reasonable and perfectly friendly reply, and then decided, I guess, that the thread really wouldn't be complete without denigrating the people who were trying to help. I'd like to expect more from list subscribers than that.
On 7 April 2015 at 16:50, Ed Summers <e...@pobox.com> wrote: > Ok, my apologies if this is coming out garbled. Here’s a list of things I > think I’ve learned as part of this discussion: > > 1) currently there is no plan to do away with the IRC stream > > //Ed > >> On Apr 7, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfa...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >> Oh! Well if you understood Yuvi right away, it seems that you *did* get a >> clear answer out of "us all". >> >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Ed Summers <e...@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> > On Apr 7, 2015, at 4:07 PM, Aaron Halfaker <ahalfa...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> > >> > Really, RCStream is what the IRC feed ought to have been -- and probably >> > would have been if those standards were available at the time of its >> > construction. RCStream solves the same problem better. >> >> Actually, I understood the first time and I agree with this assessment. I >> still don’t find it to be a compelling reason to go and do the work. But it >> probably would’ve taken about as long as it has to try to get a clear answer >> out of you all :-) >> >> //Ed >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
