Thanks both! I'm specifically looking at Wikidata's coverage, rather than Wikipedia's - in other words, work done on deficiencies in the mapping of wikimedia content onto wikidata content.
On 8 April 2015 at 07:19, Flöck, Fabian <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > from the top of my head, two on gender coverage: > the one Max just sent around: > http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631 > and another one, with a different approach, but a similar goal: > http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06307 > > We had one on diversity that also has a small section about > representativeness of the editor base, although it might not be exactly what > you are looking for: http://journal.webscience.org/432/1/112_paper.pdf > > Gruß, > Fabian > > > On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms > of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max > Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything. > > -- > Oliver Keyes > Research Analyst > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > > > > Cheers, > Fabian > > -- > Fabian Flöck > Research Associate > Computational Social Science department @GESIS > Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany > Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208 > [email protected] > > www.gesis.org > www.facebook.com/gesis.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > -- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
