Thank you, Federico!

Your link to phabricator explain this. However, it would be nice if such
changes will be described in Read.me file

Alex

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:00 PM, <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Send Wiki-research-l mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wiki-research-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: How to explain drop in random searches (Daniel Moyer)
>    2. Re: How to explain drop in random searches (Federico Leva (Nemo))
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 23:13:15 -0700
> From: Daniel Moyer <[email protected]>
> To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
>         <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] How to explain drop in random searches
> Message-ID:
>         <CAKvQcvXcMXSc2SkDVJTTbs2MXuCSpeHcHeSd=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> A lot of thanks and credit to the analytics team for keeping these counts
> running.
>
> That being said, it might be a good idea not to draw too many conclusions
> from the pageview counts on user behaviour without a closer analysis,
> especially for the Special:* pages. As demonstrated by the October 16th
> drop, these are strongly affected by instrument bias.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Alex Druk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Because similar patterns are observed for many other languages (but not
> > all), it looks like  R.Stuart Geiger explanation is correct: from October
> > 16 2014 Special:Random page is just not counted any more (with some not
> > clear exceptions).
> >
> > That’s a pity because we lost valuable source of info how Wikipedia users
> > look for information. Random search was (and is?) a major way users
> explore
> > Wikipedias. In many languages Special:Random was significantly higher
> than
> > Main_Page count and certainly higher than search with index.php.
> >
> > (I do not want to point finger, but maybe somebody at WMF considered this
> > emotionally.)
> >
> > IMHO, logs should be logs and log actual activity.  At least such
> dramatic
> > changes in logging user’s activity should be documented somewhere.
> Betters
> > in Read.me file that should accompany raw logs.
> >
> > >Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:08:40 -0700
> > >From: "R.Stuart Geiger" <[email protected]>
> > >To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
> > >        <[email protected]>
> > >Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 117, Issue
> > >        14
> > >Message-ID:
> > >        <CAKt0Q=e-_=0=
> > [email protected]>
> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> > >
> > >Going from 86,000,000 a month to 31,000 a month is quite a drop, and the
> > >shift is pretty dramatic. It goes from 1.7 million one day to 715 the
> next
> > >and stays flat (http://stats.grok.se/en/201410/Special:Random).
> > >
> > >I was also thinking there could be a bot or something that is scraping
> > >Special:Random, but the drop also happens for Special:Random/Talk --
> which
> > >hardly anybody uses, but it still drops flat the same day (
> > >http://stats.grok.se/en/201410/Special:Random/Talk). It doesn't happen
> > for
> > >Special:Upload or Special:Log though.
> > >
> > >October 16th, 2014 is the day it changes. Anybody know of something that
> > >might have changed that day with logging? Also, there have to be way
> more
> > >than ~1,000 hits a day to Special:Random. Perhaps pageviews started to
> be
> > >counted for the page that it got redirected to, rather than the
> > >Special:Random page itself. But then why wouldn't it go to 0? What are
> > >those ~1,000 hits a day?
> > >
> > >[image: 👻] ~~ it is a mystery ~~ [image: 👻]
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Alex Druk
> > [email protected]
> > www.wikipediatrends.com
> > (775) 237-8550 Google voice
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/attachments/20150511/6bc3632b/attachment-0001.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: emoji_u1f47b.png
> Type: image/png
> Size: 1778 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/attachments/20150511/6bc3632b/attachment-0001.png
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 09:18:54 +0200
> From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <[email protected]>
> To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
>         <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] How to explain drop in random searches
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Alex Druk, 12/05/2015 07:56:
> >>Going from 86,000,000 a month to 31,000 a month is quite a drop, and the
> >>shift is pretty dramatic. It goes from 1.7 million one day to 715 the
> next
> >>and stays flat (http://stats.grok.se/en/201410/Special:Random).
>
> That's expected. The new data excludes redirecting URLs (requests which
> got a 301, 302 or 303 status code.
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T73790
>
> Nemo
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
> End of Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 117, Issue 17
> ************************************************
>



-- 
Thank you.

Alex Druk
[email protected]
(775) 237-8550 Google voice
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to