Google the paper's title to see many related papers, including this one http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01551.x/full Not the same as that paper, but orbiting that space...
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:37 PM, James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jonathan, I am so sorry > http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2015/e-Biz/GeneralPresentations/11/ > is behind a paywall. It wasn't when I first found it, and that version is > miles away from me at the moment. It describes a truly fascinating > empirical simulation laboratory participation experiment, which shows that > anonymous review is more accurate than review with identity disclosure, > which is actually very easy to find literally centuries of replication, but > it also found that the costs were more similar than conventional wisdom. > > I want everyone to see it because of what the specific > experiment says about ways to detect bias at the lowest possible cost. I > have a feeling that you will quickly think of ways to extend it to study > projects' editing. > > Can someone who has access to that paper please share the method > and results as fair use? > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
