Hi Kerry,

Thanks a lot for your reply! Honestly, I am not aware of the problem you
mentioned that many wikiprojects don't do regular quality assessment. This
problem really matters to me, because I want to get the relatively true
quality of a revision of an article. I know Aaron's automated quality
assessment tool, but it is also based on a machine learning classifier,
which is also my goal to automatically predict quality, especially quality
change. So I can't take the results of this tool as my ground truth.

2016-06-10 12:16 GMT+08:00 Kerry Raymond <[email protected]>:

> If you are not aware of it, many wikiprojects don’t do any kind of regular
> quality assessment. Often an article is project-tagged and assessed when
> it’s new (which generally means the quality is assessed stub/start/C) and
> then it’s never re-assessed unless someone working on it is trying to get
> it to GA or similar and hence actively requests assessment.
>
>
>
> So it’s easy for an article to be much better quality (or even much worse
> quality, although that’s probably less likely) than its current assessment.
>
>
>
> I think you might do better to use Aaron’s automated quality assessment
> tool and apply it to different versions of a set of article and see how
> that changes over time. Whatever the deficiencies of an automated tool, I
> suspect it’s still more reliable than the human processes that we actually
> have. But I guess it depends on whether the focus of your study is the
> quality of articles or is it the process of assessing the quality of
> articles? My sense is that you are interested in the former rather than the
> latter.
>
>
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
> *From:* Wiki-research-l [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Shiyue Zhang
> *Sent:* Friday, 10 June 2016 12:42 PM
> *To:* Research into Wikimedia content and communities <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Wiki-research-l] How to get the exact date when an
> article get a quality promotion?
>
>
>
> Hi Pine,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply. Yes, it is English Wikipedia. Exactly I want to get
> the timestamp of an article's quality rating change. I know
> the particular diffs shouldn't be considered as the reason why quality
> rating change. I'm trying to get a prediction of quality change beyond a
> certain time period, so I need the start and end quality of the time
> period.
>
>
>
> I hope anyone have the experience on this problem can give me some advice.
> Thanks a lot!!!
>
>
>
> 2016-06-10 9:47 GMT+08:00 Pine W <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi Zhang,
>
> Is this for English Wikipedia?
>
> You can probably use automation to find the timestamp of an article's
> quality rating change on English Wikipedia. Other people on this list
> probably know how to do this, and they may comment here.
>
> However, that does not imply that any paricular diffs should be considered
> to have a quality that is equivalent to the quality of the article.
> Measuring the quality of diffs is an inexact science, but you might want to
> take a look at Revision Scoring. Aaron Halfaker can tell you more about how
> useful, or not, Revision Scoring is for measuring the quality of diffs.
> Hopefully he will respond to this email.
>
> Pine
>
> On Jun 9, 2016 18:29, "Shiyue Zhang" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm doing research on Wikipedia article quality, and I take advantage of
> WikiProject Assessments. But I can only get the latest quality level of an
> article. I wonder how to  get the quality of each revision, or how to get
> the exact date when an article get a quality promotion, for example, from
> A-class to FA-class.
>
>
>
> I really need your help! Thanks!
>
>
>
> Zhang Shiyue
>
>
>
> --
>
> Zhang Shiyue
>
> *Tel*: +86 18801167900
>
> *E-mail*: [email protected], [email protected]
>
> State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology
>
> No.10 Xitucheng Road, Haidian District
>
> Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
>
> Beijing, China.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Zhang Shiyue
>
> *Tel*: +86 18801167900
>
> *E-mail*: [email protected], [email protected]
>
> State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology
>
> No.10 Xitucheng Road, Haidian District
>
> Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
>
> Beijing, China.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>


-- 

Zhang Shiyue

*Tel*: +86 18801167900

*E-mail*: [email protected], [email protected]

State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology

No.10 Xitucheng Road, Haidian District

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

Beijing, China.
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to