Hi Pine,

You may find some of the findings in the following research helpful:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Understanding_hoax_articles_on_English_Wikipedia

Best,
Leila


On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi research community,
>
> I have been struggling to find a way to present the subject of Wikipedia's
> quality to newbies for the LearnWiki video series.
>
> On the one hand, I have heard of studies that compare Wikipedia favorably
> to Britannica, and studies showing that medical students and licensed
> professionals consult Wikipedia. On the other hand, we have lots of stub
> articles, and in the August WMF Metrics and Activities meeting we heard
> that some users are skeptical of the quality of an encyclopedia that anyone
> can edit.
>
> I am thinking that quality of an article, as well as quality of Wikipedia
> as a whole (in varied language editions), could be measured in terms of
> completeness, verifiability, and neutrality, assuming that measures of
> those three dimensions are possible.
>
> For completeness, I found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
> Wikipedia:Completeness, which has fascinating if somewhat unhelpful
> descriptions of encyclodynamics and encyclostatics.
>
> Another resource, which may be a bit more helpful, is
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_
> Editorial_Team/Assessment#Statistics.
>
> I believe that there have been studies about vandalism reversions, and the
> accuracy or inaccuracy of Wikipedia science articles. I am wondering if
> there have been any more holistic studies of Wikipedia completeness,
> verifiability, and neutrality, either using sampling methods or using
> automated tools.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pine
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to