Hi Peter, Re: your question about getting historical ORES article quality predictions, there's an open ticket on Phabricator <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T146718> to add these data to the public replicas hosted on Labs (and therefore accessible via both SSH tunnel and Quarry). Chime in on the discussion if you'd like to see these tables added!
Right now I believe the best way to access historical scores is to download and parse the full dataset <https://datasets.wikimedia.org/public-datasets/enwiki/article_quality/>. But halfak or others may be aware of better methods. Best, Jonathan On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Peter Ekman <pdek...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll suggest Wikihistory, e.g. > https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/wikihistory/wh.php?page_title=Tulip_mania > which gives all the editors (ranked by number of edits), article > size(?) and edits (per year, month, or even weeks). > There's a bit more at > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulip_mania&; > action=info#mw-pageinfo-watchers > which includes info on page watchers, recent edits and a wikidata > link. > Page views at https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en. > wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range= > latest-30&pages=Tulip_mania > only goes back a couple of years. Before that is an inconsistent > series (somewhere) > All these are available from the history tab on the article page > The only other thing that I'd want is the ORES scores (AI quality > prediction for any individual version given the permid). > Is this best place to get these at > https://ores.wmflabs.org/v2/scores/enwiki/wp10/?revids=769824240 ? > Is there an easy way to get a regular-interval time series of these? > (I wouldn't expect a complete time series for 1,000s of versions!) > > Hope this helps. > > Peete > > > > > > > ===== > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:18:59 +1300 > From: "Stuart A. Yeates" <syea...@gmail.com> > To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities > <wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] tool / framework for article lifecycle > stats ? > Message-ID: > <CAC_Lu0bjKgdcRYeKVr2U9Cr_hzatW10jiVi8=bDFcTXE4rs9Nw@ > mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Is there a tool or framework forgetting article lifecycle stats in an > automated fashion. Is anyone aware of something like that? Things like > creator (+ their basic stats), total # of edits, who's edited the article > (+ their basic stats), article age, article flags, etc. > > I'm reasonably platform / language agnostic. I'll only need stats on dozens > of articles an hour, so no need for a weaponised platform. > > > cheers > stuart > -- > ...let us be heard from red core to black sky > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: <https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wiki-research-l/ > attachments/20170315/57c6f7b0/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > -- Jonathan T. Morgan Senior Design Researcher Wikimedia Foundation User:Jmorgan (WMF) <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jmorgan_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
