Hi Leila,

I'm curious about the in-depth reading differences according to the
socio-economic status. Why do you think such differences exist?

Regards,
Micru

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 1:15 AM Leila Zia <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As some of you know, we started a line of research back in 2016 to
> understand Wikipedia readers better. We published the first taxonomy
> of Wikipedia readers and we studied and characterized the reader types
> in English Wikipedia [1]. During the past 1+ year, we focused on
> learning about the potential differences of Wikipedia readers across
> languages based on the taxonomy built in [1]. We've learned a lot, and
> today we're sharing what we learnt with you.
>
> Some pointers:
> * Publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00474
> * Data:
> https://figshare.com/articles/Why_the_World_Reads_Wikipedia/7579937/1
> * (under continuous improvement) Research page on meta:
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Characterizing_Wikipedia_Reader_Behaviour
> * Research showcase presentation:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase#December_2018
> * A series of presentations to WMF teams and community: Look for tasks
> under https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T201699 with title "Present
> the results of WtWRW" for link to slides and more info when available.
> * We will send out a blog post about it hopefully soon. A blog post
> about the intermediate results is at
> https://wikimediafoundation.org/2018/03/15/why-the-world-reads-wikipedia/
>
> In a nutshell:
> * We ran the taxonomy of Wikipedia readers in 14 languages and
> measured the prevalence of Wikipedia use-cases and characterized
> Wikipedia readers in these languages.
> * While we observe similarities in terms of the prevalence of the use
> cases as well as the way we can characterize readers, we can see that
> Wikipedia languages lend themselves to different distributions of
> readership and characteristics. In many cases, the one-size-fit-all
> solutions may simply not work for readers.
> * Intrinsic learning remains as the number one motivation for people
> to come to Wikipedia in the majority of the languages, followed by
> media.
> * In-depth reading and the reading of scientific oriented topics is
> highly and negatively correlated with the socio-economic status and
> Human Development Index of countries the readers in these languages
> are coming from. Long articles that may seem just too long for the
> bulk of our audience in US, Japan, and the Netherlands is in high
> demand in India, Bolivia, Argentina, Panamá, México, …
> * ...
>
> This research was not possible without the extensive contributions by
> our formal collaborators: Florian Lemmerich (RWTH Aachen University)
> and Bob West (EPFL). On the WMF end, I was fortunate to work with
> Diego Saez on this project as well as more recently, Isaac Johnson.
> And all those in the Reading Web and Legal team who supported us
> throughout the process. I also want to underline the amazing work that
> the volunteers in the languages in the study did to support us heavily
> to learn more about their languages, not only through help with
> communications within their communities but also with the translation
> task which was not an easy one as they were asked to offer their time
> not only to translate but also do in-person meetings with us for us to
> make sure the intent of the question is translated the same way across
> the languages. Usernames Strainu, Tgr, Amire80, Awossink, Antanana,
> Lyzzy, Shangkuanlc, Whym, Kaganer, عباد_ديرانية, Satdeep_Gill, Racso,
> Hasive: Thank you!
>
> Next we are going to extend this study to include demographics
> information. More information about it coming out in the next few
> weeks. (And I will send out a separate email to wikimedia-l about this
> topic and future research over the weekend. I need some time to
> finalize the message to make the message most useful for that
> audience.:)
>
> Best,
> Leila
>
>
> [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05379
>
> --
> Leila Zia
> Senior Research Scientist, Lead
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>


-- 
Etiamsi omnes, ego non
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to