Thanks

On Mon, Jul 15, 2019, 3:57 PM Janna Layton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just a reminder that the Research Showcase is this week!
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:45 PM Janna Layton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The next Research Showcase will be live-streamed next Wednesday, July 17,
> > at 11:30 AM PDT/18:30 UTC.
> >
> > YouTube stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9vvwV5KfW4
> >
> > As usual, you can join the conversation on IRC at #wikimedia-research.
> You
> > can also watch our past research showcases here:
> > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Showcase
> >
> > This month's presentations:
> >
> > Characterizing Incivility on Wikipedia
> >
> > Elizabeth Whittaker, University of Michigan School of Information
> >
> > In a society whose citizens have a variety of viewpoints, there is a
> > question of how citizens can govern themselves in ways that allow these
> > viewpoints to co-exist. Online deliberation has been posited as a problem
> > solving mechanism in this context, and civility can be thought of as a
> > mechanism that facilitates this deliberation. Civility can thus be
> thought
> > of as a method of interaction that encourages collaboration, while
> > incivility disrupts collaboration. However, it is important to note that
> > the nature of online civility is shaped by its history and the technical
> > architecture scaffolding it. Civility as a concept has been used both to
> > promote equal deliberation and to exclude the marginalized from
> > deliberation, so we should be careful to ensure that our
> conceptualizations
> > of incivility reflect what we intend them to in order to avoid
> > unintentionally reinforcing inequality.
> >
> > To this end, we examined Wikipedia editors’ perceptions of interactions
> > that disrupt collaboration through 15 semi-structured interviews.
> Wikipedia
> > is a highly deliberative platform, as editors need to reach consensus
> about
> > what will appear on the article page, a process that often involves
> > deliberation to coordinate, and any disruption to this process should be
> > apparent. We found that incivility on Wikipedia typically occurs in one
> of
> > three ways: through weaponization of Wikipedia’s policies, weaponization
> of
> > Wikipedia’s technical features, and through more typical vitriolic
> content.
> > These methods of incivility were gendered, and had the practical effect
> of
> > discouraging women from editing. We implicate this pattern as one of the
> > underlying causes of Wikipedia’s gender gap.
> >
> > Hidden Gems in the Wikipedia Discussions: The Wikipedians’ Rationales
> >
> > Lu Xiao, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> >
> > I will present a series of completed and ongoing studies that are aimed
> at
> > understanding the role of the Wikipedians’ rationales in Wikipedia
> > discussions. We define a rationale as one’s justification of her
> viewpoint
> > and suggestions. Our studies demonstrate the potential of leveraging the
> > Wikipedians’ rationales in discussions as resources for future
> > decision-making and as resources for eliciting knowledge about the
> > community’s norms, practices and policies. Viewed as rich digital traces
> in
> > these environments, we consider them to be beneficial for the community
> > members, such as helping newcomers familiarize themselves on the commonly
> > accepted justificatory reasoning styles. We call for more research
> > attention to the discussion content from this rationale study
> perspective.
> >
> > --
> > Janna Layton (she, her)
> > Administrative Assistant - Audiences & Technology
> > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> >
>
>
> --
> Janna Layton (she, her)
> Administrative Assistant - Audiences & Technology
> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to