> And there are only two occurrences of '.patch' under hacking[1] so > the choice was obvious, at least for me :^)
Yes, I wasn't criticizing your corrections, just starting (I hope) a discussion. :)
> And there are only two occurrences of '.patch' under hacking[1] so > the choice was obvious, at least for me :^)
Yes, I wasn't criticizing your corrections, just starting (I hope) a discussion. :)