Heya, I noticed your message earlier on IRC :) I brought up the issue with Wikia briefly, though in the context of mobile browsing. I think it's a fair point, as mobile browser usage is ever increasing, and Monaco isn't perfect for small screens and simple browsers. Assuming you're not going to do a lot of editing from such browsers, one workaround for the moment is to set up a second account with your prefs set on a simple skin, to save you changing it each time you visit.
Do many people use text only browsers? What kind of situations? Regards, George (Kirkburn) 2008/10/4 James Twyford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Have the monaco designers looked at how pages look in a text-mode > browser (I'm using elinks) as compared to monobook? > > Picking some random article while logged out: > http://www.wowwiki.com/Ashbringer[?useskin=monobook]<http://www.wowwiki.com/Ashbringer%5B?useskin=monobook%5D>. > In Monobook, 21 > pages... In Monaco: 32. Actual article content: 18 pages. (1 page is > 24 rows of 80 characters, a standard terminal window size) > > I know this is the reason the for the blind wikis are still using > monobook (or they were the last time I heard about it), but is there > any plan to fix this? Especially the two pages of cruft before page > content. I'd like to think this would help the almighty page rank > too... Less junk on the page certainly makes the job easier for the > spiders. > > Thoughts? > > -james > -- > Live or die trying. > Get Firefox! http://www.getfirefox.com > _______________________________________________ > Wikia-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikia-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikia-l
