https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13127
Mr.Z-man <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Mr.Z-man <[email protected]> 2008-12-18 23:46:51 UTC --- Rather than adding a confusing, vaguely named attribute to the refs, why not just make any calls to a named ref that have actual content, where the name has already been used, a "sub-reference" of the first instance? Right now, if you something like: Text<ref name=foo>Foo</ref> More text<ref name=foo>Bar</ref> You get: 1. ^ a b Foo the "Bar" in the second ref is just silently ignored. However,if it worked like: ^ a Foo b Bar it could be used for page numbers, or anything else. The only problem with this is that it would require the first instance to be the "main" ref, which could cause problems. Though this could probably be worked around by either using the ref with the most content as the main, or with a "main" attribute to mark the main ref in a group based on name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
