https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14648


Dovi Jacobs <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |




--- Comment #15 from Dovi Jacobs <[email protected]>  2009-01-10 20:22:59 
UTC ---
Rob, thanks so very much! Starting to learn how to use it...

These seems to be a bug regarding $wgFlaggedRevTags.

"Accuracy" works just fine. But "completeness" and "formatting" give gibberish,
both for the name of the field and for the levels 0-4 within it. It is possible
to select based on number, but the description is gibberish.

>From what I can tell from the system messages, the defaults are "Accuracy",
"Depth" and "Style," which means that the two non-standard ones are *precisely*
the ones that don't work.

So perhaps the following simple solution might work: Simply revert the
installation to the three defaults. (I.e. replace "Completeness" and
"Formatting" with "Depth" and "Style") using the current localization at
Betawiki. Then we can customize locally (as I have already done regarding the
specific elements within "accuracy"). This is how Rotem advised us to do things
anyway (see comments above).

PS Another small bug I noticed is likely connected to the RTL environment. See
comments here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_talk:FlaggedRevs#Minor_bug.3F

PSS Also, I noticed that admins and bcts don't get automatically promoted, and
it doesn't seem to work unless the individual promotes himself. Is it supposed
to work that way?

Thanks so much for helping to resolve this!


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to