https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17130
--- Comment #3 from Happy-melon <[email protected]> 2009-01-23 17:19:56 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=5723) --> (https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=5723) Patch to change the <textarea> to an <input>. Against r45848 Hmn. Attached patch anyway, this is really trivial unless I've missed a glaringly obvious dependency. I don't really follow Brion's comment about it being a "usability regression": why would we be encouraging long comments (and then silently reformatting them) for moves, but not for other log summaries? There should be consistency here: either *all* summary inputs should be textareas, or they should *all* be inputs. Having one different gives the impression that the log summary is somehow different, when in fact that is not the case at all; they're treated *exactly* the same, and the same limitations and issues apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
