https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17592





--- Comment #3 from Purodha Blissenbach <bugzilla.wikime...@publi.purodha.net>  
2009-02-22 02:08:45 UTC ---
nds is a common code for a set of some 4000 diverse languages, as some scholar
see it. About a dozen+ of those also have ISO codes on their own, several of
which are again group codes (e.g. wep) while other are not (e.g. gro). Included
are both living and extinct varieties. For various reasons none of the more
distinctive codes are suited to identify any of our wiki projects, although
they could, in theory, be used to be tagged onto pages or sequences of text
here and there, which happen to be written in one of those specific varieties.
Unfortunately, we have no good software support (yet) for such tagging.

While all varieties of nds are astonishingly well mutually understandable when
spoken (considering their wide geographic spread),
when written, they follow either of two base orthographies, one Dutch-like, and
another German-like, which makes written texts much harder to mutually
compreend than spoken language. Hence the "schism" of nds-DE, and nds-NL in our
wikis. Since our localizations are 100% written, it is justified, to
distinguish orthographies. (Using ISO 3166 country codes to do so is not
really. Following ISO 639 rules verbatim, we needed to apply for orthography
subtags. Using country codes is, however, available in ISO 639 for geographic
tagging, which in our case gives a 100% coincidence with the orhographic
diversion. Although it's not its original purpose, it turns out usable for us) 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to