https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18231
Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]> 2009-03-28 15:42:36 UTC --- I think the problem is a real one, even though the argument about XML is invalid. The point is that <ref>...</ref> should enclose the statement that a reference is *for*, i.e. the statement it supports, rather than the reference information itself. That way, it would be clear which reference supports which statements. For practical reasons however, that would make things tricky, because attribute values are considered to be plain values, but the reference info is quite often complex wikitext. One solution would be to split it up: <statement id="foo">some text</statement> ... <ref for="foo">reference info</ref>. Note that the <ref> could acourr anywhere inthe text, it would be rendered at the end. The statement tag would not be visible at all. This would be more flexible and semantically more expressive than the current way of doing things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
