https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32753
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] 2011-12-02 14:34:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Since this second one comes from within a template, the current parser can't > really assign it a byte position within the article text. I'm not too familiar > with how this output is generated so will have to take a peek to say more. > Ideally it at least shouldn't mess up the later sections, but I'm not sure how > a "byteoffset" helps if you don't have a "bytelength"... possibly this is just > a bad data structure that's not really suitable for how sections are handled. > :( Why is it actually called byteoffset when it is a character offset and not a byte offset? I propose renaming it to charoffset, maybe. I understand that the parser has no notion of sections in templates, I don't really care. But what I care about is the byteoffsets. Or actually where a section starts (and then implicitly where it ends), so that I can take them apart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
