https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33455
--- Comment #3 from Bawolff <[email protected]> 2012-01-01 12:36:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I did not realize this. But we agree that this makes WantedFiles completely > unusable? Heck, just the sheer number of false positives make it totally useless > > I understand that the queries are expensive. I also guess that mediawiki, due > to its excellent page caching has no mechanism for caching database query > results, correct? Such consistency queries could, from a user standpoint, > easily be updated only once a day, but then fully. Provided it is shown > transparently how old the results are. But I understand that this would need a > new infrastructure. We actually do cache the queries and not just the output on to the page (in the querycache table). The total number of results cached is controlled by [[mw:manual:$wgQueryCacheLimit]]. Special:wantedfiles should also have the line on it: The following information is cached, and was last updated 16:04, 31 December 2011. To indicate how outdated the info is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
