https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32432

Saibo <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #11 from Saibo <[email protected]> 2012-01-04 03:53:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Marking invalid. The supplied test case works for me. 
> 
> Yes, it's possible that at some point in the past, thumbnails were slow to
> render, but urgent site issues should be discussed on IRC while they're
> actually happening, not on Bugzilla 6 weeks after the fact.

One time there is no one on IRC who responds in wikimedia-tech, next time I get
told to file it to bugzilla...  *grr*  Don't tell my bug report is INVALID!


> 
> Maybe at some point in the future we will have sufficient historical service
> time data to let us confirm or maybe even diagnose this sort of thing after 
> the
> fact. But at the moment we are mostly limited to real time analysis.
> 
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Should not be to hard to reproduce this. Currently it happens all the time 
> > for
> > all new images or simply when creating a gallery in a size that was never
> > rendered before. For example, go to
> > http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org
> > and switch to 250 images per page.
> 
> The browser should limit concurrency to about 5, so say if it takes 2 seconds
> per image, then that would be 1 minute 40 to load all images. Is that what you
> see?
> 
> We only have 60 threads on 48 cores for the whole image scaling cluster, so
> obviously if you want 250 images at a time, it's going to take a while, even
> with unlimited client-side concurrency. If you don't want it to be slow, then
> don't do that.
> 
> Maybe ms5 will hit an I/O limit before we get to 60 threads, but it's clear
> from the profiling data that ms5 is not permanently in such a state. The
> average thumb.php service time measured by MediaWiki is only 156ms.

I saw it also for a single image as I have clearly written above.. maybe your
reading ability is INVALID?!  

Testcase 1 still is like I reported it. Maybe you should try from a German IP.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to