https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33632
--- Comment #3 from [email protected] 2012-01-10 14:35:58 UTC --- Not sure, but I don't think r100610 is a solution. The bug 33409 is more interesting as the template changes will initiate a lot of article changes and especially as (2) seems to indicate that the worker fails somehow. Note the test case which does not use {{REVISION...}} also have the same problems, but perhaps that is just a variation of the same problem? There was also an additional template involved, but that one is now updated to not use <includeonly> for the category. It will probably take a few hours or a few days to see if it starts to fill up with erroneous entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
