https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33746

Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |

--- Comment #15 from Mark A. Hershberger <[email protected]> 2012-01-29 
18:24:10 UTC ---
I'm not sure how closing this will match with "Let's ensure that the Wiki*
experience is consistent" -- a statement that RobLa agreed with.

See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.technical/58397/focus=58453

We have code that worked (despite the lack of dependencies being named) at
least 75% of the time and not fixing this bug would mean it suddenly fails 100%
of the time.

If we want to let people know that they shouldn't expect this to behave in the
future, that's fine.

Because it worked in the past (for whatever reason) we should clearly
communicate that behavior people have come to expect will be deprecated in the
future while allowing it to work in this upcoming release.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to