https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34023

--- Comment #3 from Subfader <[email protected]> 2012-01-30 00:29:09 UTC ---
"Both distracting for most users and annoying for users who scroll down, want
to see an image, and then have to sit and wait for their connection to download
it"

That makes no sense, sorry. 1) 99,999% of the time users do not open a page in
order to scroll down to see an image. And if, it will be there FASTER than
without lazy iamges: 2) Without lazy images the image has to load as well.

And images don't "flash in" more than without lazyness (wtf? "oh noes! the
loading image scared me to death!!"). You can set a fade-in time if really
wanted.

But to be fair, the argument that it should be a browser feature not a website
feature makes sense. But the advantage here is that browsers cannot know what a
 page is used for. Humans do.

I wonder what the commons guys think about it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to