https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1310

--- Comment #27 from Gabriel Wicke <[email protected]> 2012-02-11 23:26:49 UTC 
---
I also share Daniel's concerns about changing the behavior of existing content.

In the longer term, I think that it would be desirable to add a fully parsed
input mode for extension tag contents. This could take the form of a token
stream or a DOM fragment built from those. Extensions could choose between
plain-text input and tokens, so this would be opt-in. This is also very close
to how this is currently handled in the Parsoid parser
(http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Parsoid), although there still are some issues to
solve (e.g. an unclosed html comment in the extension content). Nested nowiki
is covered by parser tests already, and works as expected.

Are there extensions that need nested extension tags, but otherwise unparsed
input?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to