https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6455
--- Comment #150 from Happy-melon <[email protected]> 2012-02-24 15:57:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #149) > I don't think injunctions like "Please don't change this unless you are a > developer." are very cool. It is quite possible that Lua will be decided > against (as it was before) and then this should be re-opened. Those two comments are in no way exclusive: a developer would be best placed to know if any change occurs to the commitment to Lua. Although as has been said before, the existence of an alternative is not a prerequisite for WONTFIXing this. > Or maybe we should change this bug to "provide some form of string handling, > and soon" because otherwise we might have Lua kicking around for another 6 > years and still be no further forward. That would be bug 26092, of which this bug is a dependency. Everyone knows that this is an open, important and complicated issue; if changing the title of a bug were all it took to magically untie the gordian knot, we would have done it by now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
