https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17577
--- Comment #20 from Bawolff <[email protected]> 2012-03-02 01:47:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > It's been 3 years already, but Hillary is still very slow: > http://www.webpagetest.org/result/120302_AS_8bd3281d5ad4e661f4a2ad91d0a006b9/ > > Second run is not significantly more efficient then firs one: > http://www.webpagetest.org/video/compare.php?tests=120302_AS_8bd3281d5ad4e661f4a2ad91d0a006b9-r:1-c:0,120302_AS_8bd3281d5ad4e661f4a2ad91d0a006b9-r:1-c:1 Well second run being almost same speed is mostly due to counting ajax from the banner load. If you discount the ajax, it'd be roughly 6.2 seconds vs 5.5 seconds. If you don't count one image that took insanely long to return a 304 (which could just be a rare occurrence. Or it could be common place, I don't really know), the comparision becomes 6.2 seconds vs 3.6 seconds. Hence the speedup by fixing this bug might not be as much as that test would lead you to believe (It is still probably something that is fairy significant though, assuming it can be done effectively) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
