https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27488
Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #67 from Roan Kattouw <[email protected]> 2012-03-05 17:48:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #64) > The title was changed to a misleading one. But I'm done with it. > > I've submitted this bug with specific needs in mind. There is no way a know > to: > 1. Load user scripts in the header to allow actually running their code BEFORE > the page starts to render (needed to inject CSS or faster adding of crucial > elements). > 2. Load user scripts in order (without the need of contacting administrators). > > If my request cannot be implemented - for whatever reason I still don't > understand (except being religiously convinced that scripts must be in the > footer) - I can live with that. Just please don't say it was fixed because it > anyones me a lot. We ended up fixing this issue for *modules*, but not for user scripts. It's true that user scripts still can't be loaded early, and Gadgets could easily be but we currently don't have support in the Gadgets extension that lets Gadgets indicate this (this would be easy to add though, and it's on the list). So you're right, we haven't actually fixed the bug as reported, although we've taken an important step by solving it for other use cases. We could consider executing user scripts early, I'll discuss that with Krinkle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
