https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29157
--- Comment #2 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> 2012-03-12 21:33:30 UTC --- Copying this comment from bug 33189 comment 1: Re-using the "noprint" class is clever, but ultimately unwise. Sometimes you want things to not be on mobile and sometimes you want things to not be on print. They're distinct categories, with some overlap. Luckily, CSS supports multiple classes. There should be a "nomobile" class that should be used when people want to hide things from mobile. Currently it looks like people are inserting dummy classes to trick the mobile parser (cf. <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tiitle=Template:Birth_date_and_age&diff=479816119&oldid=436607844>). This is bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
