https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11191

--- Comment #6 from 石庭豐 <[email protected]> 2012-03-28 13:42:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Have you ever looked at a real wikipage with these interwiki tags in real
> > situation?  Or are you talking by following the hollow theory?
> 
> This aggressive behaviour is not acceptable.

I was just asking a simple question.  If you feel it's aggressive, maybe it's
because you have something to be blamed of and what I've said reflected the
reality?

> Anyway, I've added/fixed thousands of interwikis.

Me too, and so what?

> > The inerwikis are not in any section.  They are in the whole page.  So in 
> > order
> > to modify them, one has to load the WHOLE PAGE. 
> 
> No, no and no.

No what?  

> 
> > That's really stupid.
> > 
> > If that link isn't "more useful", then I suggest removing section's "Edit"
> > links as well!
> 
> You're being POINTy.

I'm just applying the same reasoning to another thing to show how absurd it
was.  Simple logic.  Not pointy

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to