https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17322
--- Comment #10 from Chad H. <[email protected]> 2012-04-12 22:15:05 UTC --- If we make use of the feature described in issue 124 (see comment 9), we could easily use patchset-created to ping BZ with a "A change for this bug was pushed for review in gerrit 123 [project: foo; branch; bar]" We could follow up with "Gerrit change 123 was merged on DATE [project: foo; branch: bar]" Generally, I'm kind of leery about auto-closing an auto-opening bugs. I may commit half a fix for a bug and not want BZ to be closed yet. (In reply to comment #8) > I don't know whether the configuration management of WMF wikis falls under SVN > as well, but I'd also find it extremely helpful if a bug not only received a > "Fixed in r4711." comment, but also that the fix went live on labs (or > whereever) and finally on the main farm. > The plan right now is to have deployment-labs running master (so it'll get all the latest changes) and deploy master to the cluster every 2 weeks. So I think in the long run this will be a little bit less of an issue. Once we get into the cycle you'll be able to assume that anything over ~2 weeks old has been deployed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
