https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35526
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guk <[email protected]> 2012-04-13 14:50:42 UTC --- Not only should the re-sorting be reversible; there should be consistent tie-breaking on each click. A stable and intuitive tie-breaker (fallback secondary sort key) would be any one of: * the original row order * the current row order * the sort order of content in other columns. Clicking to reverse a column's sort order could either maintain the tie-breaker or reverse it. But whichever approach is chosen, there should be an implicit tie-breaker (or, equivalently, a stable sort algorithm) so that rows do not move to counterintuitive or inconsistent positions. Example moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richardguk/Unstable_tablesorter_algorithm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
