https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34529
--- Comment #9 from Danny B. <[email protected]> 2012-04-30 00:25:01 UTC --- In fact the counts above are misinterpreted and take into account only selected opinions and voices and constantly ignore certain important arguments. Being extremely ivolved in the discussion causes indisputable bias, so closing of the discussion should be done by somebody not involved or at least not involved that extremely as Okino is, not even talking about his professional bias. From the same reason I did not close the discussion myself, although I do not consider myself biased, but because I wanted to prevent similar argument against my closing. On the other hand I see the results of the discussion quite opposite way anyway. I also don't think it makes a sense to have a discussion immediately again (or consider this immediate discussion as relevant), it should wait some significant time period (i.e. half a year) before the new round will be started because it needs some new people involved in the discussion (but not fished voices) to bring new perspectives and until then it does not make a sense to spin round and round on the same arguments and within the same group of people. (Hopefully there will be more new users to set up the real community who will stay longer than now, when they start to edit and after being constantly corrected and commented by one active member, they get disgusted and leave or at least lower down their activity to sporadic contributions. Otherwise it probably doesn't even make a sense to continue with the wiki as a separate project and it should be returned back to Incubator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
