https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36650
--- Comment #2 from Fabrice Florin <[email protected]> 2012-05-22 00:42:31 UTC --- Here are the Stage 4 click tracking specs, which Dario prepared based on our discussions: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Article_feedback/Clicktracking#Stage_4_.28FeedbackPage_usage.29 Here are Dario's notes: • I didn't add the full event list to avoid combinatorial explosion, hope that's ok • I added the user_privs suffix to the first type of events (referral events) for consistency • Roan just confirmed that it's ok to track talk page impressions on the AFT5 sample (incl. random and additional) at 100% (I estimate we won't get more than 20K impression events per day and that's a theoretical upper boundary that we're unlikely to reach). • I eventually didn't add any requirements to track usage via the central log as separate for the regular feedback page: a cheap way to do this would be to add a 4th referral key (ref_log or something) to the events that support this key (i.e. landing and filter events), I would definitely deprioritize this if it requires extra work or produces potential data integrity issues we may not have time to check for before the deployment. • the additional data in the last field (page_title|rev_id) still refers to the ns0 of the article itself, not the special page. Should we support events for the central log (as above) , this should have the page name as page_title, rev_id set to NULL, ns=-1 in the dedicated ns field of the log. • this is really pushing the CT format to its limits, hope it's the last time we need to create these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
