https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37121
--- Comment #10 from Fabrice Florin <[email protected]> 2012-06-07 01:17:51 UTC --- Hi guys, As discussed, here is the list of feedback page formatting tweaks that were not deployed to production on Tuesday. It would be great if we could get them done for next Tuesday's deployment, if feasible. Let me know if you would like to pull out any of these tasks into a separate ticket. Thanks. 1. Overall * Add 'on' in the page title: 'Feedback on Drew Barrymore' (instead of 'Feedback: Drew Barrymore'). * Say '<x> posts about this page' below the title (instead of '96 feedback posts on this article'--we cannot use the 'article' word, because of internationalization policies) * Slide 'Showing' to left-align it with above text * Use these font styles and colors for indicating selected filters: - selected filter should be black and bold, same font style as 'Showing' (e.g.: 'All comments' in mockup) - the other filter link should be blue, for consistency with other links (e.g.: 'Most relevant' in mockup) This essentially reverses the color scheme we are now using for these two filter links. * Increase the width of the 'More filters' drop-down menu by about 50 pixels, to show the widest item in that menu ('Oversight-requested'), including a 4-digit counter). Increase the page minimum width by 50 pixels (up to 900), to make that happen without collisions. * Remove some of the filters that begin with 'un-', as requested in this Bugzilla ticket: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36920 ('Un-featured, Un-resolved, Un-hidden, Oversight-unrequested, Un-oversighted') * When selecting a filter, show the yellow 'Loading' label above the toolbar, to the right of the filter selection menu (instead of below the toolbar). * Don't show '0% helpful' next to any helpful labels - only show this label if more than one person marked it as helpful (this also excludes showing '100% helpful' if only one person marked it as such). * Show the numbers of 'yes' and 'no' answers, so people can get a sense of how meaningful the percentage is. This additional helpfulness info will be displayed as a tool tip, so that it appears when you hover over (x% helpful). This would be the same exact info we used to show before we switched to percentages, as shown in this example: '3 yes / 2 no' * Don't show '(0)' next to any flag labels - only show the number if it's higher than zero. * Show '(x)' counter next to flag labels in same light gray font style and size as for 'y% helpful' and don't include a link under that counter (continue to include a link behind 'Flag as abuse' and 'Flagged for abuse', though). * Only show 'Featured' or 'Resolved', whichever was selected last (don't show both one on top of another, to save space). 2. Reader View Only * Don't show readers the drop-down menu for 'More filters'. This means that readers will only have two filter options: 'Most relevant' and 'All comments' (simply remove the 'More filters' drop-down menu for readers, but not for editors). * Simplify 'Sort by' drop-down menu options to only show these for readers: - Relevant [most relevant posts shown first] - Irrelevant [least relevant posts shown first] - ---- (include divider in drop-down) - Newest [most recent posts shown first] - Oldest [earliest posts shown first] [Note that we are trying to use shorter words here, to remove visual clutter, hence the request to NOT use 'Highest relevance', which is too long. We cannot use 'Most relevant' either, because it would be redundant with the filter by the same name. It is OK to keep all the other sorting options in code, even if they are not shown in this menu, for when we get a chance to implement URL parameters for filtering/sorting.] * Don't show readers any '(66% helpful)' numbers next to helpful labels (only show them to editors and up) * Don't show readers any '(x)' numbers next to flag labels (only show them to editors - I think we're doing this already, just putting this here for confirmation) 3. Editor View Only * Show editors, monitors and oversighters the tools available for their user rights (with a greater height for each post for oversighters than for editors, based on the number of tools available to them). * If it's easy, show two more 'Sort by' menu items for editors and up, as so: - Relevant [most relevant posts shown first] - Irrelevant [least relevant posts shown first] - ---- (include divider in drop-down) - Newest [most recent posts shown first] - Oldest [earliest posts shown first] - ---- (include divider in drop-down) - Helpful [most helpful posts shown first] - Unhelpful [least helpful posts shown first] * Show editors any '(66% helpful)' numbers next to helpful labels (except 0%) * Show editors any '(x)' numbers next to flag labels (except 0) * Show gray labels for 'Hidden' and 'Oversighted' (just like 'Featured' or 'Resolved' labels, for editors only) * Show link called 'See Central Feedback Page >' at the bottom of this *article* feedback page (below the 'See More Posts' bar, same font size and style as 'See feedback page' on the permalink page). 4. Central Feedback Page * At the top of each post on that page, add a link to the permalink page under the word 'feedback', as shown in this example: '69.84.16.62 posted <feedback> to Razor cut3 minutes ago | Details' This will be exactly the same link as used under the word 'details', but it makes it part of the main sentence, rather than showing it as a minor label with a small font after that sentence. It is fine to keep the word 'Details' with its current link, as we have it now. To be clear, this change would only be for the 'central' feedback page, not to the article feedback page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
