https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36972
--- Comment #8 from Christoffer <[email protected]> 2012-06-19 09:08:11 UTC --- Not everyone that wants to be able to patrol recent changes wants to be admins, and thus introducing the patroller group can make the patrolling more efficient as we can get more patrollers that way. As long as the rollback function is the *only* way of marking several edits as patrolled in one go, it is crucial to make the patrolling more efficient with patrollers. It also saves the patrollers from many manual reverts. The abuse filter is not used very much on the nn.wiki; in fact I am the only user to have even as much as touched it; so I think we can safely skip that part for now. Regarding the "super subadmin group"; the setup here is supposed to be copied from the nb.wiki, their patrollers also have the ability to roll back edits, see here: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 As a general statement, if a user is deemed trustworthy enough to mark edits as patrolled, why should he not be entrusted with the rollback function? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
