https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37295
Krinkle <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Krinkle <[email protected]> 2012-07-20 07:33:53 UTC --- Wontfix for now. Could be reconsidered later if it is actually a problem. Right now it may appear redundant, but it is actually serving a purpose and 5-minute deployment guarantee is quite important and being relied on. If and when we are going to use ESI inside caching (or something similar) then this becomes obsolete as we will not invalidate the startup module in 5 minutes but only when it changes. Right now we can't do that because the startup module can't give itself a timestamp to load it, and putting it in the HTML means cache fragmentation as well as pollution and inconsistency (basically all the problem from before ResourceLoader). With ESI:include this becomes a possibility again because it will be separate from the overal cache and thus centrally purgeable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
