https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
--- Comment #2 from Jon <[email protected]> 2012-08-01 01:11:49 UTC --- Well.. since this uri currently returns content in a new api it would still return a 200 OK as it returns content. The warnings are not error messages and just there for further information. A developer doesn't need to worry about them. I don't see any issue with altering the content of the response, I just believe that it should be possible to handle errors better in javascript. This is not about being anal, it's about being more helpful and giving richer information in our responses. If I login and get a 400 I can quickly deduce from the error code alone that the username or password is wrong. I shouldn't have to resort to decoding the response body to work out what went wrong... I am confused to where your opposition lies.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
