https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38128
--- Comment #5 from Krinkle <[email protected]> 2012-09-19 17:49:22 UTC --- I'll see if its possible to extend jQuery.client. Otherwise we may want re-consider replacing this module with something more solid. There's two major parsers I know work very well and have been proven to work by "the mass": * browscap [1] (supported by PHP's get_browser functionality) - Currently PHP only, and the source is a hugely inefficient .ini file that isn't very future proof. Not the kind of thing we'd want to port to javascript, not to mention the huge manifest. * ua-parser [2] (forked from - Currently in many languages, including javascript. Though nodejs, we'll have to export the yaml file to JSON and figure out if there is any nodejs modules we need to substitute. [1] http://browscap.org | https://browsers.garykeith.com/ | https://github.com/GaretJax/phpbrowscap [2] https://github.com/tobie/ua-parser | https://github.com/tobie/ua-parser/tree/master/js -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
