https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38994

--- Comment #12 from Krinkle <[email protected]> 2012-10-10 18:52:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> This applies to tracking bugs as well: do you think they are annoying as well?

Yes, any unrelated stuff cluttering bug management is annoying.

(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > This sounds like a perfect job for a quick tool using the bugzilla API 
> > (based
> > on the configuration / extension setup of all wikis inside a family, a 
> > specific
> > wiki, or all wikis, even). 
> 
> I can't understand how this is related.
> 

That explains the rest of your comment.

Let me elaborate:
* Create a tool that knows which extensions are installed on a wiki and which
mediawiki/core components are especially relevant
* It can aggregate this for all bugs and for all wikis inside a family
* Output: List of bugs and their status / dependencies and what not. Lots of
possibilities. Heck, if one really feels like it build an HTML5 app that shows
changes in real-time and order by recent activity / relevance / priority.

Point is, for the same reason we don't have a watch-Krinkle tag, I don't think
we should have a watch-Wiktionary tag. Instead this is done on the user level /
project level with outside aggregations. Plus, those tools have the potential
to be much more useful to the average user than some internal process inside
Bugzilla.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to